14) Member of the Goliath Corp? No.

Another six long shots to go. And my mind is hardly at rest.

Is he a sidekick?

0) Animal
1) Is it alive? Yes.
2) Is it aquatic? No.
3) Is it mammalian? Yes.
4) Is it a domesticated animal or sourced from such? No.
5) Is it human? Yes.
6) Is it female? No.
7) Is he a member of the Fforum? No.
8) Is he a particular person (rather than a type of person)? Yes/no.
9) Is he normally wearing a suit? Yes.
10) Is he fictional? Yes.
11) Is he ffordean? Yes.
12) Does he have limited colour vision? No.
13) Is he a generic? No, usually not.
14) Member of the Goliath Corp? No.
15) Is he a sidekick? No. No. No.

Is he a politician?

16) Is he a politician? Yes!

As said earlier, I should be willing to accept this for the definite answer if it were question and answer 20. Since there are still four questions left, we could continue for the name of the politician in question, but that would then create an ambiguity in proclaiming the victor.

The actual politician I had in mind was senator Jobsworth who made an appearance in One of our Thursdays is missing. But the prefects from Shades of Grey would have served as well.

So ibborobb is now the answerer-elect.

(edited to correct spelling errors)



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 09/01/2011 04:55PM by delacuesta.

Well done ibborobb





Wouldn't the answer to Q12 exclude the prefects?

SkidMarks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>[...]
> Wouldn't the answer to Q12 exclude the prefects?

Strictly speaking: yes; but remember my note on question 12: "As stated before, I'll accept a somewhat more generic answer than I originally had in mind, and in this respect the answers to questions 6 and 12 are essentially non-essential."

(Question 6 was on male or female).

---

Let me add that answering the first few questions was unexpectedly quite some fun, as various prejudices on politicians were coming by. I acknowledge that it was hardly possible to share that fun with the participants.


(edited to correct a typing error)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/25/2011 08:03PM by delacuesta.

Ah, so that is what that meant. I wondered. :)

OK, here goes .... Skids/Del ( I think it's only you two left on here) ...
0) Animal

1) is it usually considered edible?

Is it fictional?

1) is it usually considered edible? No.
2) Is it fictional? Yes, almost always.

Is it human?

1) is it usually considered edible? No.
2) Is it fictional? Yes, almost always.
3) Is it human? No.

4) Can it fly?

1) is it usually considered edible? No.
2) Is it fictional? Yes, almost always.
3) Is it human? No.
4) Can it fly? Yes - but only in fiction.

Does it severly dislike anyone whose job-title includes the word "slayer" - unless their name is George?

1) is it usually considered edible? No.
2) Is it fictional? Yes, almost always.
3) Is it human? No.
4) Can it fly? Yes - but only in fiction.
5) Does it severly dislike anyone whose job-title includes the word "slayer" - unless their name is George? Most definitely.

Come on then ... who wants to take on the AVM mantle? Skids has served it up on a plate!

I'm truely clueless.

6) Are there subspecies including Nobilis & swamp?