New users: Please register in the usual way and then send an email to jasper(at)jasperfforde.com with your username, and write something 'Ffordesque' so we know you are a real reader, and not some idiot trying to flood the forum with dodgy Nike and Gucci gear. Thank you - Jasper


Still having trouble? Click Here for a guide to the Fforde Fforum


last updated : April 11th 2010


Nextian Chat :  www.jasperfforde.com The fastest message board... ever.
General Information 
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Goto Page: 123456Next
Current Page: 1 of 6
@< quack @< quack
Posted by: Puck (---.sfldmidn.dynamic.covad.net)
Date: January 18, 2006 12:41AM

The Paradox Thread, as promised

(sincere apologies for the bad emoticons and worse pun)



-------------------------
Metaphors be with you!

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: kaz (---.vic.bigpond.net.au)
Date: January 18, 2006 07:27AM

The paradox being that we currently have no paradoxes?

Paradoxs. Paradoxi. Para... whatever!


Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: Bonzai Kitten (61.68.164.---)
Date: January 19, 2006 02:35PM

Better not jump out of planes then.

No, wait...

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: MartinB (---.is.co.za)
Date: January 19, 2006 05:59PM

I have two keys if it helps.



__________________________________
'We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad." [said the Cat.]
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "Or you wouldn't have come here."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures In Wonderland

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: Bonzai Kitten (61.68.161.---)
Date: January 20, 2006 12:51PM

Really? Swap you a C for an A# or F

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: MartinB (---.is.co.za)
Date: January 22, 2006 08:51AM

Got one already thank you.

I was thinking of two quays, or, a pair o' docks.

So is space real?



__________________________________
'We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad." [said the Cat.]
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "Or you wouldn't have come here."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures In Wonderland

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: splat21 (195.213.113.---)
Date: January 22, 2006 01:23PM

Certainly. What there is of it.



_ _ _ _ _

If the English language made any sense, a catastrophe would be an apostrophe with fur.

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: Bonzai Kitten (61.68.165.---)
Date: January 22, 2006 01:44PM

For a given value of 'space'

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: kaz (---.vic.bigpond.net.au)
Date: January 22, 2006 10:32PM

'Space' comes in Lots. As in 'a lot of space', 'not a lot of space'.


Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: MartinB (---.is.co.za)
Date: January 23, 2006 09:44AM

Nononononono.

Is space an entity that exists in it's own right, like me or you, or is it merely a geometric abstraction between various objects.



__________________________________
'We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad." [said the Cat.]
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "Or you wouldn't have come here."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures In Wonderland

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: splat21 (195.213.113.---)
Date: January 23, 2006 12:32PM

This could get complicated. All I'm going to say is that it's as real as we are.



_ _ _ _ _

If the English language made any sense, a catastrophe would be an apostrophe with fur.

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: PrinzHilde (---.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
Date: January 23, 2006 01:31PM

That reminds me of an interesting thought experiment (I am not completely sure, but I think it is by Newton):

Take a bucket of water and suspend it from a rope. Now, revolve it around the axis of the rope. I f you are quick enough, the water will rise to the brim of the bucket, and leave an indentaition in the middle.

Now, imagine the opposite case. The bucket is hanging absolutely still, but the whole universe is revolving around it. Would the water rise? As long as there are masses around, their gravitational pull will have an identical effect. But what if there were no masses around? What if the bucket, the rope and the water were the only objects in the universe?

Newtons answer was: Whether it rises or not would be a way to discern if its frame of reference is standing still in relation to absolute space, or if it is revolving.

Modern physics says: If there were no masses, there would be no space for the bucket to revolve in. Space is spanned by the masses which are distributed in it (even if they are looked at as waveforms, in which case their wavelength would span the space).

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: MartinB (---.is.co.za)
Date: January 23, 2006 05:42PM

Another thing to consider is this:

What is between atoms or subatomic particles?



__________________________________
'We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad." [said the Cat.]
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "Or you wouldn't have come here."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures In Wonderland

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: Bonzai Kitten (61.68.171.---)
Date: January 23, 2006 06:51PM

"...it's as real as we are."

Which begs the question...

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: robcraine (83.218.27.---)
Date: January 23, 2006 10:02PM

If anyone finds some space, i could do with some. Just send it to my book shelves. I think it does exist, but has a half-life in the region of a few seconds, on a good day.

Rob



------
That statement is either so deep it would take a lifetime to fully comprehend every particle of its meaning, or it is a load of absolute tosh. Which is it, I wonder?
Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: kaz (---.vic.bigpond.net.au)
Date: January 23, 2006 10:05PM

"What is between atoms and subatomic particles", Martin? I think that's their business and not something we should poke our noses into.


Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: MartinB (---.is.co.za)
Date: January 24, 2006 09:21AM

Why not? If there is nothing then they should touch. If there is something, is it space or what?

Kitten: I was carefully not saying anything. I have no objective evidence that any one of you exist in anything other than a computer. (A mad (very mad) AI perhaps.) The only one I am more sure of is Zhark, but that's only because he sent Postie to me.



__________________________________
'We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad." [said the Cat.]
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "Or you wouldn't have come here."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures In Wonderland

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: splat21 (195.213.113.---)
Date: January 24, 2006 10:30AM

QED.



_ _ _ _ _

If the English language made any sense, a catastrophe would be an apostrophe with fur.

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: MartinB (---.is.co.za)
Date: January 24, 2006 06:12PM

I am inclined to believe you guys exist. If only because no computer can come up with some of the stuff I've seen here....



__________________________________
'We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad." [said the Cat.]
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "Or you wouldn't have come here."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures In Wonderland

Re: @< quack @< quack
Posted by: annie.leader-biblio (---.server.ntli.net)
Date: January 24, 2006 06:14PM

Oh, Splat exists. I've seen her. Not sure if I do though.



=====================================================
Some days I see the point

Goto Page: 123456Next
Current Page: 1 of 6


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.