New users: Please register in the usual way and then send an email to jasper(at)jasperfforde.com with your username, and write something 'Ffordesque' so we know you are a real reader, and not some idiot trying to flood the forum with dodgy Nike and Gucci gear. Thank you - Jasper


Still having trouble? Click Here for a guide to the Fforde Fforum


last updated : April 11th 2010


Nextian Chat :  www.jasperfforde.com The fastest message board... ever.
General Information 
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Goto Page: Previous123456789Next
Current Page: 5 of 9
Re: Committee
Posted by: EgonSpengler (46.208.48.---)
Date: May 14, 2013 07:40PM

In a quantum multiverse: All of the above.

Re: Committee
Posted by: OB (---.range86-177.btcentralplus.com)
Date: May 14, 2013 08:15PM

Mayhap, but this is NOT the Treehouse.

This is the combined sub-committees of some harum-scarum ragtag and bobtail

let's get back together again pudding besotted word play duelling nitwit.org

Re: Committee
Posted by: SkidMarks (62.6.182.---)
Date: May 15, 2013 08:47AM

We need a comittee to decide what to do next.
Who wants to chair the Ourubos comittee?

Re: Committee
Posted by: geg (---.15-2.cable.virginmedia.com)
Date: May 15, 2013 10:06AM

Sorry - popped out for custard and cream. Fortunately the Alterntive Pudding Accompaniment Committee are meeting next door, they were very keen for us to try the Goats Milk Creme Fraiche.

Did I miss anything?

Re: Committee
Posted by: CannibalRabbit (---.dyn.iinet.net.au)
Date: May 15, 2013 01:24PM

Tables Ice Cream as a suitable substitute

Re: Committee
Posted by: EgonSpengler (---.vpn.aber.ac.uk)
Date: May 15, 2013 01:43PM

We could spend the time waiting for the next JFf book? Or reorganising the Treehouse stamp collection.

Re: Committee
Posted by: bunyip (---.plain.net.au)
Date: May 20, 2013 04:05AM

Could the committee vote on the proposition that we should dispense with formal voting and go by the sounds of acclamation or of negation?

All in favour say ............

Re: Committee
Posted by: geg (---.15-2.cable.virginmedia.com)
Date: May 20, 2013 10:38AM

Chooses a dark chocolate as a very strong sign of non assent.

Re: Committee
Posted by: CannibalRabbit (---.dyn.iinet.net.au)
Date: May 20, 2013 01:00PM

Selects a Chocolate Ginger, or two ...

Re: Committee
Posted by: OB (---.range86-183.btcentralplus.com)
Date: May 20, 2013 07:19PM

Cannibal Rabbit

Hot by habit


Sorry sorry :in the days when we had subservients and masters, those glory days before committees when things got done, doggerel was a BAD thing

Re: Committee
Posted by: bunyip (143.92.1.---)
Date: May 22, 2013 06:57AM

That means 'custard or cream' is quantum, and as such both exists and does not.

So what have I been eating on my pie?

Re: Committee
Posted by: bunyip (143.92.1.---)
Date: May 22, 2013 07:01AM

That means 'custard or cream' is quantum, and as such both exists and does not.

So what have I been eating on my pie?

Re: Committee
Posted by: bunyip (143.92.1.---)
Date: May 22, 2013 08:08AM

On seeing the above posting appear twice i want to know who is trying the 'two slit' experiment with my posts!

Own up now, or be forever unknown and unknowable.

Re: Committee
Posted by: OB (---.range86-183.btcentralplus.com)
Date: May 22, 2013 10:12AM

Why is it "own up" and not "own down"?

Re: Committee
Posted by: geg (---.15-2.cable.virginmedia.com)
Date: May 22, 2013 10:31AM

I'm sure you have ownership over something, but probably not Bunyip's quantum problems, I'm pretty sure they are all his.

Re: Committee
Posted by: EgonSpengler (87.115.138.---)
Date: May 23, 2013 11:03AM

Which Bunyip?

Re: Committee
Posted by: SkidMarks (62.6.182.---)
Date: May 23, 2013 11:21AM

There is only one. He is like a singularity which ties together all the quantum committeeverses

Re: Committee
Posted by: geg (---.15-2.cable.virginmedia.com)
Date: May 23, 2013 11:31AM

That's the agenda for the next committee meeting sorted then:

1) Which Bunyip?
2) What Bunyip?
3) Why Bunyip?

Re: Committee
Posted by: EgonSpengler (---.mat.aber.ac.uk)
Date: May 24, 2013 10:41AM

'There is only one' or 'There can be only one'? The answer may change the cosmos.

Re: Committee
Posted by: OB (---.range86-176.btcentralplus.com)
Date: May 24, 2013 11:56AM

He is a kind of magic: there can be only one.

Goto Page: Previous123456789Next
Current Page: 5 of 9


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.