Re: About the Nextarillion.
Posted by: Anonymous User (---.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
Date: July 30, 2003 06:04PM
'Letters' is one of the things I have not gone into, though I am aware that there is a lot of material in there. My guess (and here you are a better judge) is that they are less likely to be 'canonical' than the 'HOME' series for two reasons :-
1) Chris T will have referred to them in HOME if he saw a point in doing so. Heaven knows there is enough in there already ---
2) JRRT's opinions about his works clearly changed with time. Letters are of the moment. They are not re-written over and over again in a variety of subsequent versions (except perhaps by me!) Who can say if the content of a letter is associated with a discarded line of thinking? A HOME reader.
But that is really my excuse for not reading any more than I can bear!
I know you are a transport geek, I have been 'on the wagon' (or off it might be better!) for about a year now, don't encourage me. If I proved unhealable, we could natter for ever about it.
I shall try to use that gag if I can! However opportunities are limited.
I'm sorry about the website delay. There was a narrow window of opportunity to do the job, and then I got into a massive rewrite of something else. In the meanwhile, if you want to print it from Word in the font of your choice, an e-mail can gladly be sent.
FWIW I was not surprised by anything in 'Arthropod' etc. JRRT's musings are based on exactly the same attitude I would have had. Having time to stew over his writings, any Christian would (I think) be concerned by having created a 'God' that could not be bothered to communicate with his creations. That would have been to create something which, whilst no serious person would have taken it to be a 'God', would by association have been a bad 'signpost' to the kind of God you believed in yourself. Thus JRRT was stuck with not thinking it appropriate to have overt religion in his works (which is I believe covered by Humphrey Carpenter) and as a result giving the appearance that Eru had no concern to contact the men of Middle Earth. This sort of thing is diabolical to the Christian view of God. No wonder he got into a twist about it. If you want an analysis of what I had suspected as an RC viewpoint before, let's go private; but in any case, I think 'Arthropod' (as it seems I will always call it) has only one sentence that could be taken as RC, and I am not sure about that as it is of dubious interpretation (not having it in front of me that's the best I can do).
In fact the result of the reading I have done since I last exchanged views with you has been to find my own speculations about the possible intentions of Tolkien to be a bullseye. Now that they are established as part of his fiction, rather than a projection of mine onto it, I am much more likely to write about those parts, as I can now do so from a relatively uncontroversial position. Seems I'll be reading a bit more before N4 gets started.
I suppose I shall have to read the letters, but my opinion from what I have seen so far is that he may have felt the need to be seen to be Catholic, but of course there is a very large body of Christianity which is not disputed by any of the denominations, and he appears to have restricted himself to that.
When is that new Tom Shippey thing out? I must be a glutton for punishment.