New users: Please register in the usual way and then send an email to jasper(at)jasperfforde.com with your username, and write something 'Ffordesque' so we know you are a real reader, and not some idiot trying to flood the forum with dodgy Nike and Gucci gear. Thank you - Jasper


Still having trouble? Click Here for a guide to the Fforde Fforum


last updated : April 11th 2010


Nextian Chat :  www.jasperfforde.com The fastest message board... ever.
General Information 
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Goto Page: Previous1234567Next
Current Page: 4 of 7
Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Magda (---.med.umich.edu)
Date: February 28, 2003 05:22PM

See what happens when I get called away in the middle of posting and have to do actual work for a few minutes?

Ah well, I still added more details. And at least we agree.



--------------
"I've often said that the difference between British and American SF TV series is that the British ones have three-dimensional characters and cardboard spaceships, while the Americans do it the other way around."
--Ross Smith

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Ooktavia (---.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
Date: February 28, 2003 09:32PM

Illegal methods of research: Warning this may be boring.

Sorry for being away again, this is now practically off-topic, so...


I was a researcher for a headhunter (aggressive recruitment.) Ye olde international finance bank (Goldman Sachs, Deustch, Schroder Saloman Smith Barney) would say unto Ivan (my Boss)
"Ivan, we want to hire a convertible bond seller for the German Market"
and Ivan would say to me "Octavia- Map the convertible bond sellers of the world, mwa ha ha ha!"
And I would say "Bugger"
Then I'd ring up lots of banks and tell lies to make them tell me who was working on the CB desk. Lots of lies. Such as; being a conference organiser, wanting someone to speak/invite. Being a stupid web-journalist who spoke to someone last week and now can't remeber their names. Being from the admin department (phone trouble) etc etc etc.
This is why it was illegal, however, ring a desk up and tell 'em you're a headhunter, you're lucky if they just tell you to **** off before putting the phone down on you.



My reality check has just bounced again.......

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Sarah B (---.blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: February 28, 2003 10:45PM

A question to run off-topic again...

Anyone read any Freda Warrington?

And if you have, have you read that triology that starts with 'The Amber Citadel'? I've got it by my bed but haven't started it yet. Just wondering what to expect...



--------------

There's a hole in my creativity bucket and it's all leaked out.

Re: research
Posted by: dave (---.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
Date: February 28, 2003 10:51PM

ooooh, I did all kinds of that sort of research. As a legal librarian you're asked to find out all sorts. Like how many copies of a single a particular artist sold in a certain time-period. You try getting that out of the Chart Information Network without them telling you (in a very polite way) to sling your hook.

Weirdest request though was one partner who needed a copy of the morse code alphabet cos his mate had sent him a postcard in morse code.

All chargeable to a client, I'm sure.... ;-)


Re: Knickers!
Posted by: jon (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: February 28, 2003 11:51PM

Ooktavia wrote:

> Illegal methods of research: Warning this may be boring.
> snip

Oh. I was hoping for more necromancy, myself.



- - -
I am very interested in the Universe. I am specialising in the Universe and everything surrounding it. - E. L. Wisty

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Anonymous User (---.prem.tmns.net.au)
Date: March 01, 2003 06:44AM

My Ladies Guide says "In our opinion, sentimental literature...has a direct tendency in the direction of impurity. The stimulation of the emotional nature, the instilling of sentimental ideals into the minds of young girls, has a tendency to develop passions prematurely, and to turn the thoughts into a channel which leads in the direction of vicious habits." Anyone wanna know how the authors define 'vicious habits'? NO? thank god for that.


Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Sarah (---.vip.uk.com)
Date: March 01, 2003 09:49PM

I'd like to know how they define "sentimental literature". The first time I ever read "Jane Eyre", I was about 14 and I wept buckets. It wouldn't have been so bad but we were doing it in English classes at school...



..........................................................................................

That which does not kill us makes us stranger.
(Llewelyn the dragon, Ozy and Millie)

Sarah

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Ooktavia (---.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
Date: March 02, 2003 07:53PM

Sentimenal litrature? Anything more recent than Pamela, probably. I read Les Misserables (in english, I have no french) when young, and even now, the death of Jean valjean makes me cry, even after the 1000000 reading.

Hope you are feeling better. I will send you Fred to kick the germs away (with his very own Mars Bar of Mass destruction tm) if required....



My reality check has just bounced again.......

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Sarah (---.vip.uk.com)
Date: March 02, 2003 08:57PM

Thanks - I'm a lot better now, though it would almost be worth feeling ill to enjoy the spectacle of Fred the platypus engaged in this unusual form of germ warfare. :-)

I've never read <i>Les Miserables,</i> I'm afraid. After all, given my susceptibility to floods of tears, the title didn't exactly fill me with encouragement!



..........................................................................................

That which does not kill us makes us stranger.
(Llewelyn the dragon, Ozy and Millie)

Sarah

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: poetscientistdrinker (---.cache.pol.co.uk)
Date: March 02, 2003 09:17PM

Jane Eyre made you weep?

Now come on, it's not THAT badly written...



PSD

==========

This is the work of an Italian narco-anarchic collective. Don't bother insulting them, they can't read English anyway.

Re: Knickers! (& Librarians)
Posted by: Simon (193.82.99.---)
Date: March 03, 2003 07:13PM

I used to be a librarian, or rather a [lower- ranked] 'library assistant', too...
It was a Saturday job (mostly just shelving retruned books) for about 2 1/2 years in my late teens, and then a Summer job (filling in for regular staff who were going off on holiday, and thus more varied in nature) for three years running (i.e. just before I went off to university, & then the Summer breaks between my years there...) afterwards. That was in the London Borough of Ealing, 1976-1980, and worked out as being about equivalent to one year's full-time employment in the job in terms of days worked.
My books WERE filed alphabetically for a while, but then they got too numerous for keeping in one place _ and piles of newer acquisitons started appearing around the room _ and that situation lapsed. However I did recently finish sorting my CD collection (currently = just over 1500 titles) out into categories & arranging those in each category alphabetically according to either composers (for most of the 'Renaissance' or 'Classical' ones) or main performers (for most of the rest), or by title for compilations.

***********************************************************

Warning! Product may construe Newts...

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Anonymous User (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: March 03, 2003 09:11PM

If Jane Austen counts as sentimental literature, then I think I know what they were on about. I read a lot of Austen when a girl. When I was a girl, I mean, not Jane.


Re: Knickers!
Posted by: poetscientistdrinker (---.cache.pol.co.uk)
Date: March 03, 2003 11:09PM

Ooh, another newbie! Hello Katie, make yourself at home. Nice sig, btw.

Am I really the only person to not massively enjoy reading Jane Eyre? It was alright, but I wouldn't rush to re-read it. I almost ended up in a fight with one of my friends over it the other night, curiously. However I rescued it by steering the conversation round to Alice, who we both think is annoying.



PSD

==========

This is the work of an Italian narco-anarchic collective. Don't bother insulting them, they can't read English anyway.

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Simon (194.242.159.---)
Date: March 05, 2003 01:22PM

I had to read 'Jane Eyre' for the English Literature O-level, didn't find it particulalry interesting back then and haven't tried re-reading it since... Maybe I will do so now that I've got a different viewpoint on it...

**********************************************************

Warning! Product may continue Newts...

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Simon (194.242.159.---)
Date: March 05, 2003 01:25PM

By the way, I see that this thread has far more entries than have any of the other ones in this particular fforum. Might it be that the title has been attracting people's attention more than is usually the case?

**********************************************************

Warning! Product may conmingle Newts...



Post Edited (03-05-03 20:22)

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Sarah (---.vip.uk.com)
Date: March 05, 2003 06:19PM

That is quite possible. Though any newcomer who isn't familiar with this Fforum may well be baffled that a thread called "Knickers!" has ended up being all about "Jane Eyre".

I think that's part of the charm of the Fforum. ;-)



..........................................................................................

That which does not kill us makes us stranger.
(Llewelyn the dragon, Ozy and Millie)

Sarah

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: Simon (193.82.99.---)
Date: March 05, 2003 07:23PM

Presumably Jane wore some?

************************************************************

Warning! Product may confound Newts...

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: poetscientistdrinker (---.cache.pol.co.uk)
Date: March 05, 2003 11:13PM

Erm, wouldn't be too sure on that - I'm not sure how modern they are.

I know that they found a pair of Queen Vic's pants - 51 inch and crotchless. No, really...



PSD

==========

This is the work of an Italian narco-anarchic collective. Don't bother insulting them, they can't read English anyway.

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: fuzz (---.cable.ubr05.na.blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: March 06, 2003 01:01PM

*vigerously scrubs eyes with bleech*
cheers psd, I reall needed _that_ image.



.

Re: Knickers!
Posted by: poetscientistdrinker (---.cache.pol.co.uk)
Date: March 06, 2003 07:28PM

She left them behind in Castle Howard, apparently



PSD

==========

This is the work of an Italian narco-anarchic collective. Don't bother insulting them, they can't read English anyway.

Goto Page: Previous1234567Next
Current Page: 4 of 7


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.