Bits that don't make me laugh (as much)
Posted by:
Jazz_Sue (---.range86-134.btcentralplus.com)
Date: June 04, 2007 01:52PM
I think I've worked out why I get so anally retentive when it comes to Jasper's work - it's because he is so damn good. I can still remember my first RE lesson at school, because the teacher asked us to find as many genres of book as possible within the Bible. We discovered romance fiction, scifi, horror, thriller, mild erotica, poetry etc etc (I can't remember humour being in there though - guess even God ain't perfect) The point being, no other work has so much variety within its pages. The Bible covers practically every genre going.
Now I'm not saying JF is better than Jesus or anything, but he is one of a very small number of authors who can cross the divide between, say, humour into pathos, or pathos into tragedy, and inspire the relative emotions in the reader. For example, Douglas Adams is funny, and sometimes moving, but I could never read one of his passages and be on the edge of my seat. Dean Koontz is exciting, but I smile inwardly rather than lol at his lighter moments. Pratchett is nearest, but even he doesn't cause that sudden shock you feel when, for example, you discover what Landen's fate is to be, or how Felix gets his face.
The book that does this most for me is LIAGB. I found the scene's where baby Landen drowns extremely distressing, probably because I'm one of those mums who has nightmares about the same thing happening to her own kiddywinks (and who recently read about the American woman who - some years back - deliberately drowned her own children by rolling the car into a lake, with them strapped in their seats helpless, just to keep her lover. Horrible. Give her the noose.) In my mind, I imagine the scene in the book differently, with the car coming up sans Landen, sans baby seat, Goliath having fixed it so he never existed at all and then erasing his parents' memory. I can't imagine a two year old drowning like that.I admire Jasper's guts in writing about it though - I never could.
The other bit is where Colonel Next sacrifices himself to save the world. I find this incredibly well written - moving but also funny, like when JF describes him as turning to 'pudding.' It's a welcome dose of humour at exactly the right point. My own father is dying from a very painful illness and I found this out just as I got to that scene in the book, so it has a particularly poignant meaning for me. Reading the bit at the end, where Thursday basically says she has discovered that dying, and being gone, are rarely the same thing was a great comfort to me - I'm going to read that aloud at dad's funeral. I'd bet I'm not the only one to get comfort from those words.
Sorry to be so morbid but I just wanted to express that these books, to me, are sheer genius. Nobody else can make me laugh, cry, and reach for the beta blockers in the same small space of time. Just as in TV comedy, humour works best when it is injected with a healthy dose of pathos - the brain reacts better to confusion, and there is nothing more boring than a book where the reader is just expected to laugh all the way through. It's as if the author is wearing a funny nose and glasses and saying 'Look at meeee! I'm so funneeee!' Like I say, boring. The reader needs passages of poignancy, thrills, and shocks alongside the giggles and Jasper is a master at this.