My apologies for being off-minded lately. And thank you Mysticat for reviving the game for me.

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)

3) Some sort of Pot-plant?

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.

4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain?

4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain?

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.
4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? 4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? Although I admit that the repetition adds to the poetical potential, I regret to have to say that it doesn't even slightly resemble anything like a garden, nor indeed anything like rain. In short: No.

[wonders when the breadbox question would come about]

5) So, Have you got moss growing in your breadbox?

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.
4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? No.
5) So, Have you got moss growing in your breadbox? I had to discard the last breadbox I owned because something was starting to grow in it, and unfortunately it was not moss. The item I have in mind would have fitted into it, but only in single - a pair wouldn't.

6) Is the vegetable cooked.?

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.
4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? No.
5) Have you got moss growing in your breadbox? No. The item I have in mind would have fitted into it, but only in single - a pair wouldn't.
6) Is the vegetable cooked? No, not "cooked", although some kind of heating is usually applied to it for the last century or so.

"vegetable, with some mineral traces"
"some kind of heating is usually applied to it for the last century or so"

How did you find out about my mother-in-law's meatloaf?

Is the item for wearing?

I assume any similarity between whatever meatloaf dish and the item I have in mind to be utterly accidental.

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.
4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? No.
5) Have you got moss growing in your breadbox? No. The item I have in mind would have fitted into it, but only in single - a pair wouldn't.
6) Is the vegetable cooked? No, not "cooked", although some kind of heating is usually applied to it for the last century or so.
7) Is the item for wearing? In the sense of clothes, shoes, etcetera: No. In certain other senses, the verb "to wear" is applicable to the item, though.

8) Is the vegetable element wood? (would that we knew)

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.
4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? No.
5) Have you got moss growing in your breadbox? No. The item I have in mind would have fitted into it, but only in single - a pair wouldn't.
6) Is the vegetable cooked? No, not "cooked", although some kind of heating is usually applied to it for the last century or so.
7) Is the item for wearing? In the sense of clothes, shoes, etcetera: No. In certain other senses, the verb "to wear" is applicable to the item, though.
8) Is the vegetable element wood? (would that we knew). I had to look up this one: It would be wood if the definition of wood would allow for such an interpretation. In normal usage it does not. Confusingly, the generic name for the item (mind I'm asking for a specific) is named after some kind of wood even though technically it isn't nowadays.

Is it worn ornamentally?

Egon, good to hear from you.
I'm afraid you misinterpreted my answer to question 7. There are two distinct meanings of the verb "to wear" that apply to my item, but neither has to do with bodywear, be it functional or ornamental.

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.
4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? No.
5) Have you got moss growing in your breadbox? No. The item I have in mind would have fitted into it, but only in single - a pair wouldn't. [edit: an average breadbox might contain about four]
6) Is the vegetable cooked? No, not "cooked", although some kind of heating is usually applied to it for the last century or so.
7) Is the item for wearing? In the sense of clothes, shoes, etcetera: No. In certain [edit: two] other senses, the verb "to wear" is applicable to the item, though.
8) Is the vegetable element wood? (would that we knew). I had to look up this one: It would be wood if the definition of wood would allow for such an interpretation. In normal usage it does not. Confusingly, the generic name for the item (mind I'm asking for a specific) is named after some kind of wood even though technically it isn't nowadays.
9) Is it worn ornamentally? No. The item as it stands can be ornamental, though.

I now see that my original answer two question 5 could be misleading. My last breadbox was rather small which made me state it could contain at most one item. Reconsidering I must admit that an average breadbox might contain about four.

Since we are heading halfway and no-where near to even the generic description of the item, let me hint that this generic has appeared in this thread before.

100 The heating element baffles me. Is it constant heat or is it needed in cold weather? For the last century or so!!!!.

0) It is primarily vegetable, with some mineral traces.
1) It is not coco de mer.
2) Do you own one? Yes. (and being proud of it)
3) Some sort of Pot-plant? No.
4) could it be, well, just a garden in the rain? No.
5) Have you got moss growing in your breadbox? No. The item I have in mind would have fitted into it, but only in single - a pair wouldn't. [edit: an average breadbox might contain about four]
6) Is the vegetable cooked? No, not "cooked", although some kind of heating is usually applied to it for the last century or so.
7) Is the item for wearing? In the sense of clothes, shoes, etcetera: No. In certain [edit: two] other senses, the verb "to wear" is applicable to the item, though.
8) Is the vegetable element wood? (would that we knew). I had to look up this one: It would be wood if the definition of wood would allow for such an interpretation. In normal usage it does not. Confusingly, the generic name for the item (mind I'm asking for a specific) is named after some kind of wood even though technically it isn't nowadays.
9) Is it worn ornamentally? No. The item as it stands can be ornamental, though.
10) The heating element baffles me. Is it constant heat or is it needed in cold weather? Neither. The heat is applied temporarily in a part of the fabrication process, in order to bring about a physical rather than a chemical change.

Pretty much of the components should be obvious by now.

Is it printed matter?

[exalted mode on] Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! [exalted mode off]

Now for the particulars.