New users: Please register in the usual way and then send an email to jasper(at)jasperfforde.com with your username, and write something 'Ffordesque' so we know you are a real reader, and not some idiot trying to flood the forum with dodgy Nike and Gucci gear. Thank you - Jasper


Still having trouble? Click Here for a guide to the Fforde Fforum


last updated : April 11th 2010


Nextian Chat :  www.jasperfforde.com The fastest message board... ever.
General Information 
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Goto Page: PreviousFirst...2122232425262728293031...LastNext
Current Page: 26 of 132
Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: geg (---.15-2.cable.virginmedia.com)
Date: July 20, 2010 01:05PM

So it's a question of semantics rather than DNA?
Since we habitually call things without calcium shells, eggs, it must be the word in front that becomes the defining one.
If you call it a chicken's egg then it needs to have been laid by a chicken because the egg belongs to the chicken that laid it. However, if you call it a chicken egg, it has to contain a chicken, but is free to have been laid by not-quite-a-chicken?


8) Does it need rails?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/20/2010 01:20PM by geg.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: SkidMarks (---.196.213.225.threembb.co.uk)
Date: July 20, 2010 05:28PM

delacuesta Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> <Geg, as stated in previous posts, it is the definition of "chicken" and "egg" that makes the answer. In your definition, egg came first. In my definition, protochick came first>


I think that we would all agree that the protochick came before the chicken or the egg, but did the protoegg come before or after the protochick?

As mammals also produce eggs, but don't usually expose them to a harsh environment, they dispense with the need to encase them in calcium. Could it just be The Daily Mail got it wrong (again)?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: delacuesta (---.adsl.xs4all.nl)
Date: July 20, 2010 06:17PM

0) Primarily mineral, but may contain vegetable and even animal elements.
1) Would it fit inside the average bread box? No.
2) Does it have moving parts? Yes, definitely.
3) Is it electric/electronic? Not necessarily.
4) Is it a form of transport? Yes.
5) Does it have at least 3 wheels? Yes.
6) Is it normally found on roads? No.
7) Is it found on farms? No. Chickens and eggs are found on farms.
8) Does it need rails? No.

<Geg: Yes, it is semantics. The rest of your argument is (at least in part) circular, and therefore invalid>
<Skidmarks: It is not that mammals ever dispensed with the calcium shell - they never developed the ability (*). Birds did. The common predecessor, reptiles, neither have nor had calcium shells (*). So some shebird (admittedly not a chicken) laid the first calcium shelled egg. Only this and nothing more>

(*) to my knowledge

[edited 3 times to remove mispelings]



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 07/20/2010 07:48PM by delacuesta.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: MuseSusan (---.rochester.res.rr.com)
Date: July 20, 2010 07:02PM

Can it fly?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: delacuesta (---.adsl.xs4all.nl)
Date: July 20, 2010 07:41PM

9) Can it fly? No.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: SkidMarks (---.196.213.225.threembb.co.uk)
Date: July 20, 2010 09:44PM

Ahah! I did not actually write that they dispensed with the calcium shell. They dispensed with the need. A totally different kettle of fish. (Also an category of animal that avoided needing calcium.)

Is it usually used by a person with a disability?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: delacuesta (---.adsl.xs4all.nl)
Date: July 21, 2010 06:56AM

10) Is it usually used by a person with a disability? No.

<Okay, I misread your statement on need. But mind, need doesn't exist in evolution. It's more about ability and advantage>



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/21/2010 04:14PM by delacuesta.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: EgonSpengler (---.is.nottingham.ac.uk)
Date: July 21, 2010 12:57PM

Is it a shopping trolley?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: delacuesta (---.adsl.xs4all.nl)
Date: July 21, 2010 04:14PM

11) Is it a shopping trolley? No.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: EgonSpengler (---.zone6.bethere.co.uk)
Date: July 22, 2010 11:37AM

Darn!

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: MistyCat (---.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz)
Date: July 25, 2010 11:25PM

Is it a pram?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: EgonSpengler (---.is.nottingham.ac.uk)
Date: July 26, 2010 12:42PM

0) Primarily mineral, but may contain vegetable and even animal elements.
1) Would it fit inside the average bread box? No.
2) Does it have moving parts? Yes, definitely.
3) Is it electric/electronic? Not necessarily.
4) Is it a form of transport? Yes.
5) Does it have at least 3 wheels? Yes.
6) Is it normally found on roads? No.
7) Is it found on farms? No. Chickens and eggs are found on farms.
8) Does it need rails? No.
9) Can it fly? No.
10) Is it usually used by a person with a disability? No.
11) Is it a shopping trolley? No.
12) Is it a pram?


13) Can it be folded up?

Edited for confusion.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07/27/2010 10:19AM by EgonSpengler.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: geg (---.know.cable.virginmedia.com)
Date: July 26, 2010 11:05PM

13) does it normally have an engine?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: MuseSusan (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: July 27, 2010 02:54AM

You left out MC's question:

11a) Is it a pram?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: delacuesta (---.adsl.xs4all.nl)
Date: July 28, 2010 05:50PM

12) Is it a pram? No.
13) Can it be folded up? No.

I choose to ignore question 11a.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: SkidMarks (---.196.150.53.threembb.co.uk)
Date: July 28, 2010 10:28PM

What was question 11a?

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: delacuesta (---.g-star.com)
Date: July 29, 2010 05:03PM

I guess it was identical to some other question in some other one's numbering system. I adhere strictly to my own.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: geg (---.know.cable.virginmedia.com)
Date: July 29, 2010 09:35PM

You ignored number 13 too - and you're very fond of number 13 - I remember it distinctly from other rounds.

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: delacuesta (---.adsl.xs4all.nl)
Date: July 29, 2010 11:20PM

Oops! My apologies. But still I maintain my own numbering.

14) Does it normally have an engine? Yes!

Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by: EgonSpengler (---.is.nottingham.ac.uk)
Date: July 30, 2010 11:55AM

0) Primarily mineral, but may contain vegetable and even animal elements.
1) Would it fit inside the average bread box? No.
2) Does it have moving parts? Yes, definitely.
3) Is it electric/electronic? Not necessarily.
4) Is it a form of transport? Yes.
5) Does it have at least 3 wheels? Yes.
6) Is it normally found on roads? No.
7) Is it found on farms? No. Chickens and eggs are found on farms.
8) Does it need rails? No.
9) Can it fly? No.
10) Is it usually used by a person with a disability? No.
11) Is it a shopping trolley? No.
12) Is it a pram? No.
13) Can it be folded up? No.
14) Does it normally have an engine? Yes!

Hmm, an engine, at least three wheels, moving parts, not necessarily electric, not found on roads...

15) Is it a lawnmower (the ones with seats)?

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...2122232425262728293031...LastNext
Current Page: 26 of 132


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.