Re: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?
Posted by:
MuseSusan (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: October 08, 2010 02:35PM
0) The item can be entirely animal, entirely vegetable, or a combination. Many examples have mineral in their composition as well.
1) I feel curiously compelled to know if it would fit in an average sized bread bin. Most definitely, yes!
2) Does it have moving parts? In the strictest sense, yes, parts of it can move.
3) Is it decorative, rather than functional? In the strictest sense it is not decorative and serves a definite function.
4) Would I want to eat it? No!
5) Is it clothing? No
6) Is it a household item? I would not classify it as such, although in the past it has conveyed connotations of domesticity.
7) Is it alive? No
8) Is it worn on the body? (as a non-clothing item) No
9) Does one buy it in the supermarket? Not in any supermarket I've ever entered.
10) Is it a common item? Would you expect the average person or family to have one? Not common, but not exactly uncommon either. Those who have one usually have more than one, but lots of people don't have any.
11) Is it primarily used outdoors? No, it could be used equally indoors and outdoors.
12) Does it have anything to do with fire? Well yes, in the sense that it would burn if you got it hot enough. The particular example in front of me is of a material that is actually quite hard to burn. But in any case the answer is unambiguously no.
13) Is it recreational? Nowadays almost exclusively recreational.
(I'm tempted to answer the other #13 Does its use involve water, to which the answer is yes, but this would be terribly misleading and it would not be very nice of me to do that.)
Hopes the thread will continue to become a flow chart, since that would be a story for the ages: "Once when the world was young I played a game of Nondeterministic Animal, Vegetable, Mineral…"